Miller claims that the negligent treatment resulted in the loss of cattle and contributed to the poor quality of calves that were produced. Miller contends that due to Tweeten's negligent treatment of the cattle he was damaged. Tweeten sought his share of the proceeds pursuant to the agreement, and this litigation ensued. Miller endorsed the check but Norwest Bank, on instructions from Miller, refused to pay Tweeten. A check was issued to Tweeten, Miller and Norwest Bank in the amount of $19,253.92. On September 27, 1989, fifty-six calves were sold at Kist Livestock in Mandan, North Dakota. Death loss of cows was to be the responsibility of Miller unless such death was due to the total negligence of Tweeten. Miller reserved the right to check on the cattle upon notification of Tweeten. The contract required Miller to furnish one Registered bull. The proceeds from the calf production was to be divided, 45% to Miller and 55% to Tweeten. Miller was to supply 75 Registered Angus and crossbred commercial cows to Tweeten to care for.
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23660380/notifs__1_.png "tweeten issues")
The agreement required that Tweeten supply the pasture, feed, hays, grain, mineral, cake, salt and vaccine and any other things necessary for the care of the cattle. On November 22, 1988, Tweeten entered into a lease agreement with Miller. Miller toured Tweeten's farm and found it to be adequate. Miller placed an advertisement in a local newspaper to lease his cattle on a share basis with someone who had adequate pasture and hay. Miller's cattle operation was severely affected by the drought in 19. Miller (Miller), appeals from the district court judgment which held that the plaintiff, Harold Tweeten (Tweeten), should receive 55% of the proceeds from the sale of calves which he raised pursuant to a Livestock Lease Agreement. Lucas and Smith, Bismarck, for defendants and appellants, argued by Sheldon A. *823 Vogel Law Firm, Mandan, for plaintiff and appellee, argued by Joseph A. MILLER and Lorraine Miller, Defendants and Appellants. Have not used it yet, but with knowledge and experience in performing this in the past I am confident this kit will do the job.John A. I needed a kit to repair a handful of house cues that were inherited. just get some good gorilla super glue instead. don' t even mess with the cement that comes in the kit. It' s also nice that it comes with some elkmaster tips, which are great. it does the job, just takes a little longer. the planer is cheap, but you get what you pay for. The best pieces are the shaper and the tip jig. This kit is a pretty good deal considering it was only $11.95. I' ve used it to repair 2 cues, does a good job. I was surprised to get something that was manufactured so economically that function so well. The glue that came with the kit is holding rock solid. I followed the instructions and found that every item functioned perfectly.
Tweeten issues install#
I used this kit to install my first glue on tip. Have not yet had the opportunity to use the kit as yet. You will need a shaper though to shape your cue tip after installation is completed. Inexpensive and easy way to replace your cue tips. Easy instructions, Good quality cue tips. Fixed a new tip on a cue, worked great, really easy to useĮxcellent value for price.
0 kommentar(er)
